![]() I first stacked and tone mapped the different exposed pictures and then stitched the result and this worked Ok for me. My first attempt was to stitch the different exposed panorama’s and then HDR them but when I looked at the stitched panorama’s I noticed that they where different in size and pixel count.Īlso I found that EasyHDR could not work with this panorama’s so I reversed the process. Apparently, you strictly control the settings in the tone mapping so that they are 100% reproducable and match up correctly ? I would like to see if we can arrive at a good common technique or some views on what methods to use in each situation. I did this because I had expected that the tone mapping of each of the photos would result in something slightly different in the rendering, and thus when I stitched the 2 resulting photos together, the seam would be obvious. I then processed those three with easyHDR to get the desired photo. That produced 3 panorama photos at each exposure level. I first stitched 3 sets of 2 pictures each taken at different exposures. I justed posted a panorama to the group of a photo I took of the Cincinnati, Ohio USA skyline. I was very interested in your panorama processing technique. Please go on with your program and if possible I would like some more tutorial special about the theory of HDR, or if existing, references. ![]() I told many people about your program and there is even someone in Belgium that has a kind of manual on his website.( ) I tried this with The panoramafactory and autostich but the other way around works perfectly, the stacked and tonemap pictures are perfect for stitching. The other way around does not work as if I stitch first the result is that I get 3 panorama’s that are not exactly the same anymore with as result that I cannot stack and tone map. I mainly make panorama photo’s and special with this kind of photography many times the contrast is much to high due to the wide angle.įor instance I make 8 times 3 pictures that I stack first to 8 tone mapped pictures after which I stitch them. I use your program now for some time and am satisfied with the result and special the progress that is made. It seems to me the first step to effective photostacking is the same as with HDR and panorama: high quality finished masters to merge.Very good that you started with this forum as there is much to say about HDR photography There’s probably some very nice dedicated tools for that kind of work. I’m not sure about focus stacking as I haven’t been doing it. HDR and panorama can easily be created in other tools from masters made in PhotoLab. I’d rather DxO continued to focus on their main business of providing a high quality RAW development tool with good colour tools. There’s an example full resolution photo with windmills on this old post of mine. I compared many tools, including Photoshop, Affinity Photo, Aurora HDR and Nik HDR to discover that easyHDR does the best job with deghosting. Like in Lighroom :ĮasyHDR3 costs about $30 and will do exactly what you want with the PhotoLab exports, in a very naturalistic way, very quickly and without much fuss or muss. My need like many photographer is very, very simple and essential. I don’t want DXO waste time in developping HDR artistic functions like HDR after effect does : For me, the main interest in HDR is the dynamic range I can’t get sometimes in photography.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |